nypost.com      
     
   
         

 

Click here to view today's PageSix column on one page

January 2, 2004 -- DOWNTOWN artist James Tully is heartbroken after his holiday fling with former Details magazine sex columnist Anka Radakovich went bust. They were introduced by Radar editor Maer Roshan at Bret Easton Ellis' Christmas party and subsequently had an intense four-day affair. But when Tully mentioned that he might run into conservative commentator Ann Coulter - whom he briefly dated when she was a young lawyer at a Manhattan firm - while visiting his parents in Colorado, Radakovich's hot blood turned icy. "She just coldly decided to blow me off," Tully told us. "She hasn't returned any of my calls. I really feel kind of betrayed."

Continue Reading PageSix...


VICE CONVERT

http://www.nypost.com/seven/01022004/gossip/4856.htm




Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter

 

.

Ann Coulter (born December 8, 1961) is an American author and attorney at law. She is the author of High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton, Slander, and Treason. All of Coulter's books have been New York Times Best-Sellers. In addition, Ann Coulter is a legal correspondent for Human Events and writes a syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate.

Coulter graduated with honors from the Cornell University School of Arts & Sciences and received her J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School, where she was an editor of The Michigan Law Review.

Today, Coulter makes guest-appearances to give her conservative opinions on national television shows such as Hannity and Colmes, The O'Reilly Factor, American Morning With Paula Zahn, Crossfire, This Week with George Stephanapolous, Good Morning America, Hardball with Chris Matthews, Scarborough Country, and The Today Show.

 

Table of contents [hide]
1 Coulter controversy
2 Criticism of Ann Coulter
3 Books
4 External links
Coulter controversy

Ann Coulter

A prominent conservative, Coulter has been an outspoken critic of many liberal and Democratic Party movements over the years. She gained prominence during her days as a lawyer, for helping Paula Jones to sue President Bill Clinton for sexual harassment. She appeared on MSNBC to discuss the case, then wrote a book critical of Bill Clinton. Since that book became a best-seller, she left practicing the law to concentrate on writing books and columns.

Coulter has a reputation for being quite sensationalistic and relishes the role. As she told the Sunday Times of London in 2002, "I am a polemicist. I am perfectly frank about that. I like to stir up the pot. I don't pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do."

Coulter has been identified as a fundamentalist Christian, but told interviewer David Bowman, "I don't think I've described myself that way, but only because I'm from Connecticut. We just won't call ourselves that." She admires Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, and Phyllis Schlafly, and opposes the Equal Rights Amendment. [1] [2]

Two days after the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks, her syndicated column included discussion of her close friend, Barbara K. Olson who died on American Airlines Flight 77 that was hijacked and crashed into The Pentagon. In the last sentence, Coulter advocated that the United States invade the Middle East and convert Muslims to Christianity. When the editors of the National Review, a well-known conservative magazine which included Coulter's syndicated column in its publication, said they would like to discuss making changes to the latter article, she went on the national television show Politically Incorrect, accused them of censorship, and claimed that her pay was only five dollars per article. National Review Online then ended its relationship with Coulter. [3] [4] [5]

The "convert them to Christianity" comment has become one of Coulter's most infamous statements, and is widely cited by her critics. However, her supporters maintain that it was largely a tounge-in-cheek statement and intentionally overzealous. "Liberals love to pretend they don't understand hyperbole" she once quipped.

Criticism of Ann Coulter

Al Franken calls Coulter "the reigning diva of the hysterical right" in his book Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them. In two chapters on Coulter, Franken lists what he believes are false and misleading statements in Coulter's Slander, and demonstrates his belief that she misrepresents the articles she cites. For example, Slander says of the 2000 Florida recount that "Bush had won any count" and cites a Washington Post article with the contrary headline, "Study Finds Gore Might Have Won Statewide Tally of All Uncounted Ballots."

Al Franken also points out that while a newspaper's editorials are its official position, Ann Coulter takes sentences anywhere in the New York Times to represent its official opinion. If a New York Times book-review asks people on both sides of an issue to give their opinion, Ann Coulter will represent any quote she finds offensive as the official position of the newspaper.

Carl Skutsch of anticoulter.com writes that Coulter blames "liberals" for everything without ever defining the term. Coulter makes broad statements such as "liberals hate society," (Slander, p. 27), and seems to count as a liberal "anyone she doesn't agree with" which makes her books and essays "hard to argue with. Also hard to respect." [6]

A passage of Slander may be deemed hypocritical. Coulter writes "liberals refuse to condemn what societies have condemned for thousands of years - e.g., promiscuity, divorce, illegitimacy, homosexuality" (pg. 195). However, Coulter hasn't publicly condemned these things herself.

Coulter also writes in Slander, "liberals have absolutely no contact with the society they decry from their Park Avenue redoubts," implying that liberals are rich, making their opinions unimportant. Critics such as Joe Conason, author of Big Lies, point out that Coulter herself is a rich woman from an affluent background and that she does not similarly dismiss Republican politicians because of their wealth.

Treason, which contains many bold accusations against all Democrats, brought her under fire, even from many of her former conservative supporters. Many felt her claim that Democrats such as Presidents Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy had worked against America's war on Communism as unfounded. Treason's defense of Joe McCarthy also came under criticism from both conservatives and liberals, who argued that Coulter had simply failed to accurately research the facts in her attempt to rehabilitate the disgraced senator. In an interview with David Bowman, Coulter said that Joe McCarthy is the deceased person she admires the most. Coulter argues in Treason that the Venona cables have vindicated McCarthy, proving there indeed were Soviet spies in the State Department (which McCarthy was ridiculed for believing).


Howard Dean - "looking like Nuremberg rallies,

 

During an August 30, 2003, appearance on MSNBC's Saturday Final with Lawrence O'Donnell, Coulter said

that Howard Dean rallies are "looking like Nuremberg rallies," comparing Dean supporters to Nazis. She didn't explain her comparison.

Some of her critics have accused her of exploiting her looks for political purposes, while others believe it is the only reason for her success. She features prominently on the covers of her books and often poses for publicity photographs in revealing outfits. She has also denied being in her forties on several occasions.

Books

External links



Anna Wintour

Vogue magazine

(Redirected from Vogue)

Vogue magazine is a fashion and style magazine published in several countries under several names. It is widely considered the most influential fashion magazine in the world. Competitors include W, Harper's Bazaar and Elle. Vogue is published by Conde Nast Publications, Inc. The world headquarters Vogue are in New York City.

The current editor-in-chief is Anna Wintour, famous for her perfect bob and her habit of wearing sunglasses inside. A famous past editrix is Diana Vreeland.

 


 


All Franken

Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them

.

Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right is a book of political satire by humorist Al Franken, published in 2003. The book's title is a swipe at the conservative commentators of the Fox News Channel; the network's reaction to the book was to file a short-lived lawsuit that had the unintended (sceptics point out that the TV channel and publishing house are owned by the same company) effect of driving up sales of the book.

Table of contents [hide]
1 Summary
2 Publicity
3 Reviews
4 Book table of contents
5 The Issue of Footnotes and Endnotes
6 ISBN numbers
7 External Link

Summary

Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them is one of many books published in 2003 from liberals challenging the viewpoints of conservative authors such as Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter and Bill O'Reilly. This tide of liberal-oriented books by Franken and fellow authors such as Joe Conason, Michael Moore and Jim Hightower has been described by columnist Molly Ivins as the Great Liberal Backlash of 2003.

In Lies, Franken divides American media into two groups, (a) the unbiased "mainstream" and (b) the biased "right-wing":

"The mainstream media does not have a liberal bias. . . . ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, the New York Times, The Washington Post, Time, Newsweek and the rest -- at least try to be fair."

But the right-wing media -- FOX News, the Washington Times, the New York Post, the Journal editorial page, talk radio -- are "biased," the book declares. They have "an agenda." They are "not interested in conveying the truth." They "concoct an inflammatory story that serves their political goals." [1]

Publicity

FOX News sought damages from Franken, claiming in its lawsuit that the book's subtitle violated its alleged trademark rights in the phrase Fair and Balanced. But the lawsuit was dismissed, and it provided Franken with free publicity just as the book was launched. "The book was originally scheduled to be released Sept. 22 but [was] made available Aug. 21," according to its publisher, Basic Books. "We sped up the release because of tremendous demand for the book, generated by recent events."

In the lawsuit, Fox described Franken as "intoxicated or deranged" as well as "shrill and unstable." In response, Franken joked he had trademarked the word "funny" and Fox infringed his intellectual property rights by characterizing him as "unfunny." The publicity resulting from the lawsuit propelled Franken's as-of-then-unreleased book to the #1 sales position on amazon.com's best-seller list.

On August 22, 2003, U.S. District Judge Denny Chin denied Fox News Channel's request for an injunction to block the publication of Franken's book, characterizing Fox's claim as "wholly without merit, both factually and legally." Three days later, Fox filed papers to drop its lawsuit.

Franken, and others, said Fox's lawsuit was brought at its commentator O'Reilly's insistence. Following the lawsuit's dismissal, a Fox spokeswoman stated, "It's time to return Al Franken to the obscurity that he's normally accustomed to." Franken, in turn, suggested that the Judge had unwittingly supplied Fox with a more defensible trademark: "Wholly Without Merit".

Reviews

"Al Franken [is the man] of the hour. For years, we have suffered while right-wing bullies hijacked American politics and media -- persecuting a president for a consensual sex act; stealing the 2000 election; trashing the country's economy, environment and constitutional safeguards; handing the government over to the highest corporate bidders; deceiving the public into a bloody quagmire; and then brazenly smearing anyone who dared to criticize this orgy of dreadful leadership as un-American. The instant, runaway success of Franken's new book is not just a result of Fox News' inexplicable decision to shoot itself in the foot and head by launching an idiotic trademark-infringement lawsuit, but also the author's bold -- and roaringly funny -- knack for confronting the Bush presidency and its prevaricating apologists." -- Salon Magazine

"Al Franken is the Spongebob Squarepants of the radical left. Outside of the obvious physical resemblance, Franken has other characteristics in common with the cartoon character. He is almost competent at what he does, has an over-inflated value of his self-importance, and is all too frequently given over to mindless bleeting when upset. The comparison is probably a bit harsh, and it's an unintended insult to Spongebob that my five-year-old daughter probably won't forgive. It is, however, true --- unlike 99 percent of what is in Franken's new book, Lies, and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them." -- Joe Hartlaub, Book Reporter

"In the kicking, spitting spirit of current all-star political discourse, Al Franken gives as good as he gets. His quintessential ad hominem attack title, Rush Limbaugh Is a Big, Fat Idiot, has already established his flair for the requisite games. Name calling, fact molding, gotcha!: all figure prominently in Mr. Franken's instant best seller Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right, just as they do in most of the books that Lies attacks. Whatever their partisanship, these sporting diatribes share two underlying attitudes: 'What gray area?' and 'It's all about me.'" -- Janet Maslin, New York Times

Book table of contents

The Issue of Footnotes and Endnotes

The book criticizes Ann Coulter for listing the sources of her book "Slander" at the end of the book (as endnotes) instead of at the bottom of pages of the main text (as footnotes). Franken writes that it is easier for a reader to check sources by glancing to the bottom of the current page than by turning to the end of a book. However, "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them" itself uses endnotes.

(Note by a later contributor. Yes, there are endnotes. Two of them. One of which is a jab at Coulter's use of endnotes. There are several dozen footnotes.)

The book does not have an index.

ISBN numbers

External Link


Islamophobia

.

Islamophobia is the fear and hatred of Muslims or Islamic culture in general. Given the strong association between Arabs and the religion of Islam, Islamophobia often expresses itself as a form of anti-Arab racism, though not all Arabs are Muslim and the majority of Muslims are not in fact Arab.

The term itself is of recent coinage, and reflects the influence of such 1990s movements as multi-culturalism and identity politics. It most often appears in discourse on the condition of immigrant Muslims living as minorities in the West.

However, its origin dates back to the Crusades. It has remained present in Europe for many centuries.

In France, a more recent factor contributing to Islamophobia was the occupation of Algeria and systematic human rights violations such as torture carried out by the occupiers, since fear and hatred of victims is a natural part of any colonization process.

Another factor driving Islamophobia is the rise of anti-Western Islamist movements, which have either come to power outright in some countries (Iran, Sudan, post-Soviet-era Afghanistan), or else exerted a strong influence on government policy in others (Saudi Arabia, Pakistan).

It is sometimes claimed that the increasing fraction of North Americans and Europeans who identify themselves as Muslims is a factor driving Islamophobia. However, Islamophobia (or any other racist fear) is often present among populations with extremely few Muslims (or other perceived minority).

Perhaps the most important factor shaping the present wave of Islamophobia (as of 2003), though, is the extremely large and disproportionate media coverage given to Islamist-inspired terrorism, for example, to the September 11 Terrorist Attacks, while relatively little media coverage is given to equivalent acts of terrorism by other groups or nation-states. As a result, Islamophobia is characterized by the belief that Muslims are religious fanatics, have violent tendencies towards non-Muslims, and reject as directly opposed to Islam such concepts as equality, tolerance, and democracy.

Though such characteristics do in fact apply to most Islamist movements, many people mistakenly believe that most Muslims are Islamist, when in fact the Islamist movement is only a minority position. How big of a minority, though, is a matter of intense controversy. The American scholar Daniel Pipes, for example, has been branded an Islamophobe and bigot by the Council on American-Islamic Relations for suggesting that as many as 10% of Muslims have Islamist sympathies[1].

Recently there have been several efforts by non-Muslims to combat Islamophobia. In the wake of September 11, for example, a few non-Muslim women practiced hijab in a show of solidarity with their Muslim counterparts, who it was feared would be particularly vulnerable for reprisal given their distinctive dress. Non-Muslims also helped form community watches to protect mosques from attack.

In Israel, there are many organizations working to end anti-Muslim bias among Jews, as well as to end hatred of Jews among Arabs. See the entry on projects working for peace among Israelis and Arabs.

Examples of Islamophobia

See also: anti-Islamism, dhimmi, persecution of Muslims, persecution of Christians, Islam and anti-Semitism

External Links


Red Scare

.

The term Red Scare has been applied to two distinct periods of intense anti-communism in United States history: 1917-1920 and the early 1950s. Both periods were characterized by widespread fears of communist influence on US society and communist infiltration of the US government. These fears spurred aggressive investigation and (particularly during the 1917-1920 period) jailing of persons thought to be motivated by communist ideology or associated with communist or socialist political movements. The term is most often used in describing the political atmosphere surrounding domestic political persecutions and violations of civil rights, but can also describe the closely related Cold War fears of imminent attack on the United States or its allies by the Soviet Union or the People's Republic of China.

The term itself is arguably pejorative, belittling anti-communists by implying that their fears were overblown or hysterical.

Table of contents [hide]
1 The first Red Scare
2 The McCarthy period
3 Reactions to the Red Scare
4 Continuing controversy

The first Red Scare

The first major Red Scare in American history occurred directly after the Russian Revolution of 1917 which brought the downfall of the czars and rise of Lenin. Fears of a communist plan to similarly overthrow the government of the United States, triggered by a series of anarchist bombings in June of 1919, led to the Palmer Raids against anarchist, socialist, and communist groups, and the jailings of left-wing activists such as Eugene V. Debs using the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918.

The McCarthy period

The Red Scare reappeared during the McCarthy era from 1948 to the mid-1950s. During the late 1940s several sensational news events caught the public attention, including the trial of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg for treason (which resulted in their heavily publicized executions); the acquisition of an atomic bomb by the Soviet Union which spelled the end of the United States' monopoly on nuclear weapons technology; and the beginnings of the Korean War. Events such as these had a noticeable effect on the opinions of Americans in general about their own safety and security, and they gave rise to a subtle feeling of paranoia that centered upon a supposedly inevitable nuclear war with the Soviet Union, and the idea that a vast conspiracy of communist spies and sympathisers was constantly working to bring the downfall of the American people.

The Red Scare hysteria manifested itself in several ways, notably through the actions of the House Un-American Activities Committee, the rise of Senator Joseph McCarthy, and the acceleration of the arms race. Propaganda films like Red Nightmare were commissioned to further popular fears of communism and the Soviet Union.

It also had subtle effects on America's way of life, contributing to the popularization of fallout shelters in home construction. It can also be seen as one factor that contributed to the rise and popularity of science fiction films during the 1950s and beyond. Many thrillers and science fiction movies of the period used a theme of a sinister, inhuman enemy that was planning to infiltrate society and destroy the American way of life. (One of the best examples of this is the classic film Invasion of the Body Snatchers.)

Reactions to the Red Scare

Many Americans responded to the cruder manifestations of the Red Scare by dismissing all claims by anti-communists concerning the enormity of communist atrocities overseas or infiltration in the United States. Though many of the more outré accusations of the McCarthy period—such as the claim that President Dwight D. Eisenhower was a communist—now seem laughable, the opening of Soviet historical archives following the collapse of the Soviet Union has provided evidence for less grandiose accusations, such as the claim by Whittaker Chambers that Alger Hiss worked for Soviet intelligence. Similarly, reports of mass murders committed by communist states including the Soviet Union under Josef Stalin, China under Mao Zedong, and Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge—once dismissed as anti-communist propaganda—are now well-documented in the historical record.

Continuing controversy

Though the interpretation of the Red Scare might seem to be of only historical interest following the end of the Cold War and the near-disappearence of communism as a popular ideology, the political divisions it created in the United States continue to manifest themselves, and the politics and history of anti-communism in the United States are still contentious. One source of controversy is that actions taken against the radical left during Palmer and McCarthy periods are viewed as providing a historical template for similar actions against radical Muslims following the September 11th terrorist attacks, an analogy made explicitly both by left-wing opponents of such actions as the American Civil Liberties Union and right-wing proponents such as Ann Coulter.



United States Libertarian Party

.

The Libertarian Party is a United States political party created on December 11, 1971, in the home of David Nolan. The first and only Electoral College vote it has won was for presidential candidate John Hospers and vice-presidential candidate Theodora B. Nathan in 1972; this was also the first electoral vote won by a woman.

Table of contents [hide]
1 Platform
2 Political power of the Libertarian Party
3 Libertarians: left or right?
4 Prominent party members
5 External links
5.1 General
5.2 Libertarians as "spoilers"

Platform

Key tenets of the Libertarian Party platform include the following:

Libertarians claim that their platform follows from the ultimate value of individual liberty: the right of individuals to exercise sole dominion over their own lives and property, and to live in whatever manner they choose, so long as they do not forcibly interfere with the equal right of others to do the same. To this end, Libertarians want to reduce the size of government (eliminating many of its current functions entirely), and cut taxes.

Libertarians reject the commonly held "right vs. left" description of political positions. Instead, Libertarians refer people to the Nolan chart to communicate their perception of political orientation (see below).

Within the larger framework of libertarian politics, the Libertarian Party's platform falls roughly in the realm of free market minarchism. The party advocates limiting the government as much as possible, within the framework of the United States Constitution. As in any political party, there is some internal disagreement about the platform, and not all the party's supporters advocate its complete implementation, but most think that the USA would benefit from most of the Libertarian Party's proposed changes. However, a few Libertarians are actually anarcho-capitalists who view minarchy as a first step towards the abolition of government.

Political power of the Libertarian Party

The Libertarian Party is the third largest party in the United States by most objective measures, including the following:

Evidence opposing the view that the Libertarian Party is the third largest include:

Members of third parties often complain that the U.S. electoral system is biased against third parties by first-past-the-post voting and, in many states, by onerous ballot access laws. Despite their difficulties winning elections to high offices, however, Libertarians have been credited with helping to defeat both Democrat and Republican candidates, a charge they do not dispute. For example, Libertarian U.S. Senate candidates polled 3, 21, 29, and 6 times the margin of victory in Georgia (1992), Nevada (1998), Washington (2000), and South Dakota (2002), respectively. In these elections, one Democrat (in Georgia) and three Republicans (in the other states) were defeated. Critics contend, however, that to credit the Libertarians with this outcome, one must believe that Libertarian voters would probably have turned the election over to the loser, rather than staying home or increasing the margin of victory. Since Libertarians are drawn from both the left and the right and many would never vote for a Republican or a Democrat, it is difficult to be sure how an election would have proceeded without a Libertarian candidate. In fact, a Libertarian Party press release of January 2003 admitted that "in the past, the LP's use of the 'spoiler effect' has been essentially random, and often unintentional", and that only in 2002 did they make a concerted effort to play "spoiler" in elections. This led to the defeat of the Libertarian Party's number one target: Republican Bob Barr.

Libertarians: left or right?

Libertarians often assert that their political positions transcend the left or right taxonomy. In fact, the stated platform of the Libertarian Party does differ from positions held by both traditional "left" and "right" movements in the United States and elsewhere. Unlike traditional "left" parties, Libertarians favor minimally regulated, laissez-faire markets; unlike traditional "right" parties, Libertarians favor social freedom including legalization of drugs and strong civil liberties. Furthermore, Libertarians disagree substantially with both the Democratic and Republican parties, which respectively purport to represent the center-left and center-right in U.S. politics.

However, the party has historically had more influence on and closer ties with the Republican Party. For example, former Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich claimed to be influenced by Libertarian principles, and was praised by many Libertarians for attempting to shrink government. The tendency of the American right to co-opt the language and social critiques of Libertarians with regard to market deregulation (for example, the frequent citing of studies by the Cato Institute) contributes to a perception of Libertarians as right-wingers. One critic also contends that Libertarian campaigns against Democrats tend to be more frequent and more energetic than their campaigns against Republicans. In a 2002 South Dakota election for Senate, for example, Libertarian candidate Kurt Evans suspended his campaign a week before Election Day and urged voters to support Republican candidate John Thune.

On the other hand, Democrats come closer than Republicans to the Libertarian position on civil rights. For example, the Republicans installed John Ashcroft as Attorney General in 2001; Ashcroft was widely held to advocate massive curtailments of civil liberties, a view that only gained currency with his actions following the USA PATRIOT Act's passage. The Libertarian Party has sharply attacked these curtailments of civil liberties. The party has also made the repeal of drug prohibition laws its number one priority, a position that puts them at odds with the Republican Party.

Conservative and liberal pundits cannot seem to agree how to place the Libertarian Party, either. Prominent conservative Ann Coulter has accused the Libertarians of being a single-issue party because she disagrees with them on the Drug War, while others accuse Libertarians of focusing predominantly on issues of market regulation. Whether the Libertarian defense of social freedom makes them more a left-wing party or their defense of economic freedom makes them more a right-wing party or whether, as Libertarians say, their comprehensive defense of freedom transcends the right/left taxomony, depends on the observer's point of view.

Prominent party members

See also: List of political parties in the United States

 

External links

General

Libertarians as "spoilers"


University of Michigan

.

The University of Michigan was established in 1817 by the Michigan legislature, by way of a land grant that the Michigan Territory's Native Americans signed away. It has provided a diverse student population with a diverse set of educational opportunities, including academic and professional programs, intramural and NCAA sports programs, and more cultural activities than most residents of Ann Arbor can exploit.

The University of Michigan is often called "The Harvard of the Midwest", a title also claimed by the University of Chicago, Truman State University, and Macalaster College, among others. In response to the comparison, Harvard is often called "The Michigan of the East" by University students, alumni, and staff.

A condition of the treaty that forms the basis for most of the land grant schools in Michigan was that the education of all of the state's Native Americans would be guaranteed in perpetuity. Whether the state's obligation has been met is a topic for debate.

The university in 2003 has 51,000 students and 5,600 faculty in three campuses. The University of Michigan system includes the main Ann Arbor campus as well as two others, the University of Michigan, Dearborn and the University of Michigan, Flint. The university claims to be the largest pre-medicine and pre-law university in the country and to have the largest yearly research expenditure of any university in the United States. It is one of two colleges to have both engineering and medical schools ranked in the U.S.'s top ten. In the 1990s the University of Michigan claimed to have the largest assemblage of Apple Macintosh computers outside of the main factory. Michigan also has the highest tuition of any American state school.

In 2003 a lawsuit involving the school's affirmative action admissions policy reached the U.S. Supreme Court. President George W. Bush took the unusual step of publicly opposing the policy before the court issued a ruling, though the eventual ruling was in its favor.

Famous alumni of the University of Michigan include:

Michigan's sports teams are called the Wolverines. They participate in the NCAA's Division I-A and in the Big Ten Conference; its hockey program competes in the Central Collegiate Hockey Association. The Michigan football team won the first Rose Bowl game in 1902.

The University of Michigan Health System includes three hospitals: C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University Hospital, and Women's Hospital, as well as nearly 150 clinics and MCare, an HMO. The university opened the first university-owned hospital in the United States in 1869. The EKG, gastroscope, and Jonas Salk's polio vaccine were invented at the university.

The University of Michigan is often referred to simply as UM and U of M. The latter term is also used to refer to the University of Minnesota, the University of Montana, the University of Missouri and the University of Maryland. (Note, however, that Missouri is more often referred to as UMC or Mizzou.) University of Michigan students, faculty, and alumni are often heard to assert that only the University of Michigan is "really" the "U of M", or that it has a better claim to that appellation than the others have. The claim has no justification.

External Link


Cornell University

.

Cornell University, located in Ithaca, New York, is a major research university and a member of the Ivy League. Cornell was founded in 1865 by Ezra Cornell, a businessman and a pioneer in the telegraph industry, and Andrew Dickson White, a respected scholar. It is the land grant university of the state of New York.

Image:Cornell_image.jpg

Cornell is among the most selective universities in the country, and counts twenty-seven Nobel laureates among its affiliated faculty members and students. In 1872, Cornell became the first major eastern institution to admit women along with men. The campus is situated on 740 rolling acres overlooking Lake Cayuga, and the central portion is bounded on both sides by limestone gorges and spectacular waterfalls.

The university's 13,300 undergraduates and 6,200 graduate students come from more than a hundred countries and all fifty states. Cornell offers graduate degrees in approximately 100 academic and professional fields. Cornell's professional offerings include schools of law, management (business), medicine, and veterinary medicine.

Cornell's medical school, The Weil Medical College, and the Graduate School of Medical Sciences are located in New York City.

The Johnson Art Museum at Cornell was designed by I. M. Pei. Former professors include Carl Sagan, Norman Malcolm, Vladimir Nabokov, Hans Bethe, and Richard Feynman.

The sports teams are all called "Big Red". They participate in the Ivy League and the ECAC.

Table of contents [hide]
1 The undergraduate colleges and schools include:
2 The Graduate/Professional Colleges and schools include:
3 Other academic units include:
1 Famous Alumni
2 External Link

The undergraduate colleges and schools include:

The Graduate/Professional Colleges and schools include:

 

Other academic units include:

See also : CORC, Cornell Theory Center

Famous Alumni

External Link

"At the risk of giving away the ending, it's all liberals' fault."  
  Printer Friendly Version

Amuse your conservative friends and annoy your liberal neighbors with the brand new Ann Coulter Talking Action Figure. This incredibly lifelike action figure looks just like the beautiful Ann Coulter, and best of all . . . it sounds like Ann, too! Ann recorded these classic Coulter sayings especially for this action figure.

Push the button on the figure, and you'll hear such "Coulterisms" as:

  • "Liberals can't just come out and say they want to take more of our money, kill babies, and discriminate on the basis of race."

  • "At least when right-wingers rant, there's a point."

  • "Swing voters are more appropriately known as the 'idiot voters' because they have no set of philosophical principles. By the age of fourteen, you're either a Conservative or a Liberal if you have an IQ above a toaster."

  • "Why not go to war just for oil? We need oil. What do Hollywood celebrities imagine fuels their private jets? How do they think their cocaine is delivered to them?"

  • "Liberals hate America, they hate flag-wavers, they hate abortion opponents, they hate all religions except Islam, post 9/11. Even Islamic terrorists don't hate America like Liberals do. They don't have the energy. If they had that much energy, they'd have indoor plumbing by now."
This highly collectible doll comes in a display box with information highlighting Ann's unique contributions to America's political discourse. If you can't get enough Ann Coulter, you'll want to order the Ann Coulter Talking Action Figure today!

Don't forget to order replacement batteries!