Ed/Project Expose MSM-Report2-DEA Scandal-June11-edited.html
http://www.nswbc.org/Op Ed/Project Expose MSM-Report2-DEA Scandal-June11-edited.html
Project EXPOSE MSM Reports
Scandal & Time
noted in the announcement,
Real Change invites all members of the National Security Whistleblowers
Coalition, other active (covert or overt) government whistleblowers,
reporters, to publish their experiences in regard to their own
dealings with the media, where their legit disclosures were either
intentionally censored/blacked out, tainted, or otherwise met with a
This second project report is based on the first-hand documented experience of Mr. Sandalio Gonzalez, retired Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Special Agent in Charge. Time Magazine reporters Tim Burger and Tim Padgett had an opportunity to speak at length with Mr. Gonzalez and several other veteran DEA agents with direct knowledge of a major corruption case involving several DEA agents on drug traffickers’ payrolls in
Name, Title, and /or Background
Name: Sandalio Gonzalez
Title: Special Agent in Charge (Ret.), DEA
retired from the DEA as Special Agent in Charge of the
For more detailed background information see here.
Special Agent in Charge
United States Department of Justice
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
El Paso Field Division
Mr. Gonzalez is a native of Cuba who began his law enforcement career in August 1972 as a Deputy Sheriff for the County of Los Angeles, California. In 1973 he joined the Huntington Park Police Department where he worked as a patrolman while attending California State University in Los Angeles. He graduated with a degree in Criminal Justice in 1976, and in 1978 he joined the DEA as a Special Agent in the Los Angeles Field Division.
In 1983 Mr. Gonzalez was transferred to San Jose, Costa Rica where he served as Assistant Country Attaché. In 1987 he was promoted to Group Supervisor in Mexico City, and in 1989 he was assigned to the Inspection Division at DEA Headquarters in Washington, D.C., where he served as a Unit Chief in the Office of Security Programs and later as an Inspector in the Office of Professional Responsibility. In 1992 he was promoted as the DEA Advisor to the Commander in Chief of the U.S. Southern Command in Panama where he served until 1994. Mr. Gonzalez returned to Washington as Chief of the Drug Suppression Section in the Office of Cocaine Investigations, and in 1995 took over as Chief of the South America Section in the Office of International Operations, where he was in charge of DEA operations in South America. In January 1998 he reported to the Miami Field Division as an Assistant Special Agent in Charge, and later that year he was promoted to the Senior Executive Service of the United States as Associate Special Agent in Charge.
Mr. Gonzalez has received several performance awards while assigned to foreign and domestic DEA offices. He has participated in numerous undercover assignments and complex criminal investigations involving domestic and international drug trafficking organizations. As Advisor to the Southern Command and as a Headquarters Section Chief he provided direction and supervision to implement DEA policy in Latin America. As Associate Special Agent in Charge in Miami he was responsible for administration, Division 1 consisting of two enforcement groups, technical operations, and offices in the Florida Keys and The Bahamas; Division 4 which consists of four enforcement groups assigned to the South Florida High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA); the Orlando District Office, and the Jacksonville District Office which covers Resident Offices in Tallahassee, Panama City, Pensacola, and Gainesville.
On January 18, 2001, Mr. Gonzalez was reassigned as the Special Agent in Charge of the El Paso Field Division, El Paso, Texas, where he is responsible for DEA operations in West Texas and the State of New Mexico, including offices in El Paso, Alpine, and Midland, Texas; and Albuquerque and Las Cruces, New Mexico.
Mr. Gonzalez has been elected by DEA Hispanic Employees to the DEA Hispanic Advisory Committee for three consecutive terms, and has served twice as Chairperson of the Committee. He is a member of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association and is a Past National President of the Hispanic American Police Command Officers Association (HAPCOA).
Mr. Gonzalez and his wife Rosa have been married 29 years and have three children. Their oldest child, a graduate of George Mason University, is a DEA Special Agent in Southern California.
Name of Publication and/or
Editor and/or Reporter
Publication: Time Magazine
Reporter: Tim Padgett & Tim Burger
Complete blackout. No reason provided. The disclosure was supported and corroborated by three other highly credible veteran DEA agents, officials, and documents.
Description of Disclosure & Significance
By Sandalio Gonzalez
In late fall of 2005, Time Magazine’s DC Office was provided with detailed information and documents regarding a major story involving the DEA. The story had not been broken publicly before, and several publishers were competing to get what they referred to as an ‘Exclusive Scoop’, since they had been briefed generally and shown sample documents. Time Magazine seemed anxious to see and hear it all, and we were told they’d run it ‘big time’ if they were given documents, provided with access to witnesses, and all this ‘exclusively.’ Well, Time Magazine was in fact given everything they asked for; exclusively.
Time’s DC office reporter Tim Burger received the initial/sample
statements (with NSWBC acting as coordinator and third party), they sat
story for more than a month. Later we were told that the story was
to their Miami Office. After follow ups and pressure by NSWBC on the
this ‘exclusive story’ with Time, one last meeting was set up with Tim
meeting with the Time reporter in
The center of the report dealt with ‘never-before-public’ documents and first hand witness statements, the Kent Memo, and related subjects and information. This case and its facts, statements, and documents, given to Time Magazine before and during that meeting, involved one of the most serious allegations ever brought against DEA officers.
Here are the
major points covered by Mr.
is an excerpt from Mr.
“As discussed in my (prior) memorandum dated December 13, 2004, several unrelated investigations, including Operation Snowplow, identified corrupt agents within DEA. As further discussed in my memorandum, OPR's handling of the investigations into those allegations has come into question and the OIG investigator who was actively looking into the allegations has been removed from the investigation.”
And here is another regarding other agents and witnesses who had come forward:
“As promised, I am providing you with further information on the allegations and evidence that is already in files at OPR and OIG. Agents I know were able to vouch for my credibility and several individuals close to the prior investigations that uncovered corruption agreed to speak with me…Having been failed by so many before and facing tremendous risks to their careers and their safety and the safety of their families, they were understandably hesitant to reveal the information I requested, including the names of those directly involved in criminal activity in Bogotá and the United States. They agreed to reveal the names to me on the condition that I not further disseminate these for the time being. They are prepared to provide the Public Integrity Section with those names and everything in the files at OPR and OIG, and then some, if called upon to do so”.
According to the report,
one of the
corrupt agents from Bogotá was actually caught on a wiretap in
2004 while he
was discussing criminal activity related to the paramilitary group
United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC). The group is known to be
arms dealing at the highest levels, and has been involved in death
squads responsible for murdering thousands of Colombians.
The memo also alleged that DOJ officials shut down a money laundering investigation because they knew it was connected to the DEA corruption case in Bogotá:
and DEA, the two agencies embarrassed by the
allegations (involving the Bogotá agents) and likely to come
scrutiny for their own actions in response, demanded that my case agent
all of the (investigation) information ... over to OPR,"
In addition to the facts
That meeting gave Time Magazine one last chance, and the benefit of the doubt, to live up to its word given to us previously; to expose this major case and even more serious cover up by the Justice Department’s IG. We made it clear that after waiting for Time Magazine for months they had to give us a response within a day or two as to whether they were running the story, and if so when. The reporter, Tim Padgett, did seem genuinely interested, and made it clear that he had to persuade the editors and magazine management. He appeared to have his reservations as to the magazine’s willingness and or courage to ‘touch’ a story of this magnitude. We never heard back from him, or Tim Burger, or anyone else from the magazine. Time Magazine never delivered the ‘exclusive scoop’ given to them, all packaged with credible DEA witnesses and envelopes containing official documents. In fact, the MSM has never thoroughly covered this story. The only coverage of Kent Memo was given by web-based publisher, Narco News.
Comments in response by
Mr. Tim Padgett, reporter, Time Magazine,
I contacted Mr. Padgett twice via e-mail. To my second request he provided me with the following reply:
record, I had
no reservations about Time Magazine's "willingness and or courage
to 'touch' a story of this magnitude." Time regularly takes
on controversial stories; we simply decided in the end, after examining
material at hand, not to pursue this one.
Comments in response by Mr. Tim Burger, reporter, Time Magazine, DC Bureau:
Comments in response by Time Magazine:
several requests for response, Time Magazine editor(s) did not reply.
Statement from Professor William Weaver, Senior Advisor, NSWBC:
This disheartening episode is, unfortunately, very familiar, and the story of DEA corruption and entanglement with Colombian drug cartels appears to have been ignored after initial interest for a variety of reasons. First, it is not easily digestible and therefore runs afoul of editors’ and reporters’ prejudice toward stories that may be quickly and simply related to the public. Emphasis on simplicity instead of on what the public should know about cuts down on research and reporter time, which are expensive, and feeds into the common belief that the public is largely incapable of understanding, or uninterested in, complicated stories. Second, running such a story may anger sources of information from government that reporters have come to rely upon. As great as any one story may be, a reporter’s career in these areas often depends on keeping friendly relations with cultivated sources. Ultimately, sometimes these sources end up dictating what shall and shall not be published. Finally, a story must make it past editors and staff who have interests that conflict with the goal of getting important news to the public. Considerations of effects on advertisers, sources of information, how shareholders and management will view decisions to publish particular stories, and other matters unrelated to “newsworthiness” affect a potential story’s fate. We need only look to The New York Times’ decision to delay reporting the existence of the probably unconstitutional Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP) for an example of how forces inside MSM may outflank the newsworthy nature of a story. The story concerning the Bush Administration TSP was set to break just before the presidential election in 2004, but apparent appeals by Bush Administration officials and President Bush himself to The New York Times delayed publication until December 2005. And the story only came to light because of a whistleblower and the fact that the matter appeared destined to emerge in other forums. The refusal of The New York Times to publish the story in 2004 very possibly is the only reason that Bush prevailed over John Kerry. Time magazine’s failure to investigate the events outlined in the Kent Memo and by veteran, decorated DEA agents concerning wide-ranging government corruption is another abysmal example of how the public is ill-served by the MSM.
Statement from Sibel Edmonds, Founder and Director, NSWBC:
Our organization, NSWBC, persuaded these government sources and witnesses to come forward and provide the American people with this major report exposing corruption and cover-ups - which sheds light on the ‘real’ story of our government’s so-called ‘War on Drugs.’ Despite their reservations and the risks they faced, these witnesses agreed to disclose their first-hand accounts and documented facts, and to do so only once through what they considered to be a ‘major publication.’ During the interview, while listening to these agents and reviewing the sets of documents put in front of him, Time reporter, Tim Padgett, appeared flabbergasted and excited. At the end of the meeting he expressed it verbally and concluded that the story was incredible and highly explosive. This was a journalist’s dream: to have four veteran agents with impeccable career records as sources, to have tons of printed documents (official letters, IG reports, and more), and a major scandal contradicting the illusion of the War on Drugs - which has been costing lives and billions of dollars. I also have to add: Mr. Padgett expressed his reservations and pessimism regarding his editor(s) and Time’s management having the resolve and or willingness to run this ‘explosive’ story.
For discussion cross posted at 123 Real Change: Project EXPOSE MSM Report 2
# # # #Project Expose MSM is an experimental project created to provide readers with specific mainstream media blackout and/or misinformation cases based on the documented and credible first-hand experiences of legitimate sources and whistleblowers.I encourage those of you with direct knowledge and experience to join this project by sharing your experiences. Please E-mail me with your report,
|"...we fear that the designation of information as classified in some cases [brought forth by Sibel Edmonds] serves to protect the executive branch against embarrassing revelations and full accountability... Releasing declassified versions of these reports, or at least portions or summaries, would serve the public’s interest, increase transparency, promote effectiveness and efficiency at the FBI, and facilitate Congressional oversight." U.S. Senators Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Charles Grassley (R-IA) in a Letter to Attorney General John Ashcroft|
Join Sibel Edmonds at her New Website
• July 2, 2009: It Ain't About Hot Dogs and Fireworks By Sibel Edmonds
• June 9, 2009: The Current Battle against State Secret Privilege By Sibel Edmonds
• May 22, 2009: Two Sides of the Same Coin: Heads-Heads By Sibel Edmonds
• May 5, 2009: In Congress We Trust...Not By Sibel Edmonds
OP-ED Series, "The Highjacking of a Nation" By Sibel Edmonds
Part 1: The Foreign Agent Factor November 15,2006
Part 2: The Auctioning of Former Statesmen & Dime a Dozen Generals November 29,2006
KILL THE MESSENGER
"As the widow of FireFighter Robert J. Minara
who gave his life on 9/11/01 so that others would be saved, I deserve
to have full accountability for the tragedy that affected me and
thousands of people."
Paula A. Minara
"Nothing can ease the pain of
losing our son, Stewart Harris, in this horrific tragedy. We,
as parents, are entitled to know all the actual facts. This report MUST
Exercise your Constitutional rights - require the immediate release of the entire report completed by the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General (DOJ-IG) of its investigation into confirmed reports by FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds on the cover-up of information and leads pre and post 9/11...
You can also help by asking as many people as you know to contact Congress:
• E-mail the link to this Web site to
everyone in your contact list
Contact the House and Senate Judiciary Committees to demand the report's release...
You can copy the following text to use in your message to Congress:
I am requesting the immediate release of the entire report completed in July 2004 by the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General (DOJ-IG) of its investigation into confirmed reports by FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, but which has remained classified; and further insist that it be followed by a joint investigation by Congress, including open public hearings, into those reports of wrongdoing, criminal activities, and cover-ups against the security and interests of the United States and its citizenry.
If you would like to help our efforts in other
if you have any questions or comments about our cause or about our
Website, please send an e-mail to us at: