Last week, Hernando de Soto (the insightful Peruvian economist and author of The Mystery of Capital) wrote one of better pieces I've seen about the financial meltdown and all these "toxic assets." In the Wall Street Journal, De Soto made the compelling case that "the real problem is not the bad loans, but the debasement of the paper they are printed on." The $50 trillion in bad paper, he says, is far more than the $1 trillion in subprime mortgages that supposedly started all of this.
To put the magnitude of the derivative financial creations in perspective, de Soto describes simply the scale of all assets in the world: $100 trillion of tangible goods (land, buildings), $170 trillion of semi-liquid assets (mortgages, stocks), and $1 quadrillion of new derivatives (mortgage-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations, and so on). Let me repeat that. One quad-rill-ion -- as in one thousand trillion. First, I've never heard anyone use figures like that outside of my 5-year-old making jokes about wanting infinity or googol more minutes to play a favorite game before bedtime.
Ok, shocking numbers aside, de Soto outlines six prescriptions to avoid this kind of market failure in the future. In short, the answer is making sure "property" is not some financial figment, but something definable and trackable, something we can guarantee the value and legitimacy of. The first two guidelines he provides are why I'm writing about this.
First, he says, "All documents and the assets and transactions they represent or are derived from must be recorded in publicly accessible registries." Second, "The law has to take into account the 'externalities' or side effects of all financial transactions..." This sounds an awful lot like themes of sustainability and business. Internalize the externalities and get much more knowledgeable and open about your impacts. I couldn't agree more. The solution de Soto recommends hinges on a renewed commitment to transparency so there's no "back-room" financial market that regulators and, more importantly, investors can't see.
Transparency is one of the driving forces keeping the green and sustainability waves moving (it's a theme I touch on in my new book, Green Recovery, coming out this summer, so I'll return to this topic over the coming months). I believe that we're rapidly entering an era of radical openness, driven both by regulation -- see the EPAs recent announcement that it plans to "ask" 13,000 facilities in the United States to share data on carbon emissions -- and the rising demands of employees and customers, particularly the younger ones. The new level of transparency will make any of us old enough to remember a world before MTV uncomfortable. But the Facebook and MySpace generation will have no problem with it -- in fact, they'll be expecting it.
A renewed transparency drive may be partly fueled by the latest emotional issue of the day -- executive pay and bonuses. I don't really believe in government-mandated 90% tax brackets for bonuses, no matter how repugnant the payments may seem. But I do think the government can set standards for openness. Let's list everyone who got bonuses at these firms and how much they made. Let the court of public opinion (and that of peers and co-workers) be the judge.
I'm going to make a seemingly unlikely prediction: companies will increasingly reveal all salaries and bonuses (far beyond sharing the pay to a few top executives as required by the SEC). The most responsible companies already do this to some extent -- Seventh Generation has a public commitment to keeping the CEOs salary below 14 times the lowest salary. The biggest companies will, painfully, follow suit (about sharing, not about the 14x multiple) over the coming years as it becomes clear that the more open they are, the more trustworthy they'll be.
Imagine what openness about salaries and bonuses might do for some other thorny issues, such as equal pay for women and minorities. Wal-Mart is facing a highly publicized class action suit about its treatment of women. Will complete openness about pay generate more of these kinds of claims, or help companies avoid these problems? I have no idea, but I certainly hope it's the latter since the transparency is coming, like it or not.
How do you prepare for this new open world? It's not easy, but some of those old grandmotherly maxims seem to gain some force: don't say anything about anyone that you wouldn't be comfortable with that person hearing...or don't do anything you wouldn't want on the cover of the paper...or the standard Golden Rule certainly comes to mind. No doubt there will be some real challenges in handling increased transparency, but my hopeful view is that it will drive more ethical, sustainable behavior.
In this view, those who can't meet the standard will struggle. But those companies that are proud of their operations will be fine talking about what's in their products, how products are made, how much energy they use, how much they pay people, who else is involved in the production, and what their executives receive in compensation. They will also attract and retain the best people who trust their employers. And they will build a more loyal base of customers that feel the authenticity. Sorry for all the unbridled optimism in such a pessimistic time, but maybe it's time to look on the bright side of some of these massive changes in the works.
This post first appeared at Harvard
Business Online.
By Tom Foremski - November 21, 2009
I've been remarking lately that we haven't yet had the second market correction. People forget that after the stock market crash of 1929 the market seemed well on its way to a recovery before crashing a second time in 1932. It then took decades to recover. Investors would have to wait until November 1954 to recover to 1929 levels.
It won't be pleasant but we need that second correction so that we can get to work on the longer cycle of rebuilding value. With the current recovery in stock markets and some housing markets it seems that we might be building up to that second correction.
Is there anything that can be done to prepare? Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke is a student of the great crash so he would know best and be best positioned to mitigate its effects. But maybe there isn't much to be done except to let the financial system work through its destiny.
I was glad to see a post by DK Matai, chairman and founder of mi2g.net and ACTA Open writing about this topic on Facebook and he has some very interesting data. I'm republishing because ACTA Open is a closed group but I think this is an important article.
From:
1932: The Unexpected Second Shock
By DK Matai
They
will say, nobody saw it coming. Who could have predicted it... It is
worth noting that the 1932 stock market crash is deemed to be the worst
in the 20th century and not the one in 1929. By mid-1930, the market
was up 30% from the trough of the 1929 crash. However, by the summer of
1932, the Dow reached a low of just 11% of its high in 1929, or a loss
of roughly 89%, trading more than 50% below the low it had reached on
October 29th, 1929. If one had $1000 on September 3rd 1929, it would
have gone down to $108 by July 8th, 1932 -- end of the worst crash --
or an 89.2% loss. To recover from such a loss, one would have to watch
one's portfolio go up by 825%!
All this happened despite assurances from prominent government and
business leaders of-the-time that the worst was behind.
Here is a news headline that may sound familiar:
. September 1929: "There is no cause to worry. The high tide of prosperity will continue." - Andrew W Mellon, US Secretary of the Treasury
After the stock market crash in October 1929, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) partially recovered in November-December 1929 and early 1930.
Reassuring headlines such as the following became increasingly common:
. May 1, 1930: "I am convinced we have now passed the worst and with continued unity of effort we shall rapidly recover. There is one certainty of the future of a people of the resources, intelligence and character of the people of the United States - that is, prosperity!" - US President Hoover
. August 29, 1930: "American labour may now look to the future with confidence." - James J Davis, US Secretary of Labour
. October 16, 1930: "Looking to the future I see in the further acceleration of science continuous jobs for our workers. Science will cure unemployment." - Charles M Schwab.
On July 8th, 1932 the Dow reached its lowest level of the 20th century and did not return to pre-1929 levels until 23rd November, 1954. The full impact was not felt until the next year. By 1933, the Great Depression was very real and it would take more than 22 years before the market would regain what had been lost.
So severe was the impact of the 1929-1932 crash, that by spring of 1933, when President Roosevelt (FDR) took the oath of office, unemployment in the US had risen from 8 to 15 million -- roughly 1/3rd of the non-farm workforce -- and the GDP had decreased by more than 45% from $103.8 billion to $55.7 billion. Although the depression was worldwide, no other country except Germany reached so high a percentage of unemployment as the US. The poor were hit the hardest. By 1932, New York's Harlem district had an unemployment rate of 50% and property owned or managed by African Americans fell from 30% to 5% in 1935. Farmers in the Midwest were doubly hit by economic downturns and the Dust Bowl. Schools, with budgets shrinking, shortened both the school day and the school year. The breadth and depth of the crisis made it the Great Depression.
FDR, after assuming the presidency, promoted a wide variety of federally funded programs aimed at restoring the American economy, helping relieve the suffering of the unemployed, and reforming the system so that such a severe crisis could never happen again. After the crash in 1932:
1. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was established;
2. The US Congress passed the Glass-Steagall Act mandating a separation between commercial banks, which take deposits and extend loans, and investment banks, which underwrite, issue, and distribute stocks, bonds and other securities;
3. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was established to insure individual bank accounts for up to $100,000; and
4. Works Projects Administration (WPA), the largest New Deal agency, was set up employing millions to carry out public works projects.
However, while FDR's New Deal did help restore the GDP to its 1929 level and did introduce basic banking and welfare reforms, FDR refused to run up the government deficits that ending the depression required. Only when the federal government imposed rationing, recruited 6 million defence workers (including women and African Americans), drafted 6 million soldiers, and ran massive deficits to fight World War II did the Great Depression finally end.
The extent of the economic devastation of the 1930s went far beyond the imagination of anyone in the financial markets or governments across the world.
[ENDS]
. ATCA Open
. @G140
. Open HQR
. DK Matai
- - -
Please see additional DK Matai posts:
The
Size of Derivatives Bubble = $190K Per Person on Planet
Must
Read Analysis: Why Markets Are Still Falling . . . The Shadow
Financial
Systems
Beyond The Sub-Prime Bubble: The Other Seven Deadly Bubbles . . . - SVW
By Tom Foremski - November 8, 2008
There is a perception among some of my contacts that the financial crisis has stabilized and that the fallout from the sub-prime bubble has been contained. What is missing in that analysis is the fact that this financial crisis has still a long way to go because there are other bubbles bursting.
Interestingly, this time there is no tech bubble but there might be little that tech can do to mitigate the effects of this financial crisis and its effects on the global economy. There is no place to hide from this.
Please see this analysis of the financial crisis from DK Matai, chairman and founder of ATCA Open.
There is a rising myth of the single bubble which suggests that The Great Unwind -- manifest as the global credit crunch -- is essentially about subprime mortgage default, a USD 1.5 trillion challenge. The truth is that there are as many as eight bubbles at play which are in the process of bursting, taking the form of deleverage on an unprecedented scale. Even 1929 pales in comparison. At a recent ATCA roundtable we posed the following questions for Socratic dialogue:
I. If the Dow Jones Industrial Average has fallen from above 14,000 to below 9,000 as a result of the subprime mortgage bubble collapse, ie a 5,000+ points drop or 33% decline, where will the equities market reach by 2010 as other larger bubbles burst?
II. If the world government bond market is around USD 30 trillion, how can governments rescue the eight bubbles bursting step by step with an ever larger quantum and momentum? What ought to be the focus at Bretton Woods II starting November 15th?
There are at least eight bubbles in play worldwide and their approximate scale is as follows:
1. Subprime Mortgage linked Loans and other Assets (USD 1.5 trillion);
2. China, India, Eastern Europe and other Emerging Market Loans (USD 5 trillion);
3. Commodities (Commodity Derivatives at about USD 9 trillion);
4. Corporate bonds (USD 15 trillion);
5. Commercial (USD 25 trillion) and Residential property (USD 50 trillion);
6. Credit Cards Outstanding Debt (USD 2.5 trillion);
7. Currencies (Foreign Exchange Derivatives at about USD 56 trillion); and
8. Credit Default Swaps (USD 58 trillion) as a subset of all Derivatives (USD 1,144 Trillion).
In the ATCA briefing, "The Invisible One Quadrillion Dollar Equation" we discussed the main categories of the USD 1.144 Quadrillion derivatives market as quoted by the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland:
1. Listed credit derivatives stood at USD 548 trillion;
2. The Over-The-Counter (OTC) derivatives stood in notional or face value at USD 596 trillion and included:
a. Interest Rate Derivatives at about USD 393+ trillion;
b. Credit Default Swaps at about USD 58+ trillion;
c. Foreign Exchange Derivatives at about USD 56+ trillion;
d. Commodity Derivatives at about USD 9 trillion;
e. Equity Linked Derivatives at about USD 8.5 trillion; and
f. Unallocated Derivatives at about USD 71+ trillion.
The relative scale of the world's financial engine is as follows:
1. The entire GDP of the US is about USD 14 trillion.
2. The entire US money supply is also about USD 15 trillion.
3. The GDP of the entire world is USD 50 trillion. USD 1,144 trillion is 22 times the GDP of the whole world.
4. The real estate of the entire world is valued at about USD 75 trillion.
5. The world stock and bond markets are valued at about USD 100 trillion.
6. The big banks alone own about USD 140 trillion in derivatives.
7. The population of the whole planet is about 6 billion people. So the derivatives market alone represents about USD 190,000 per person on the planet.
Assuming a 10% conservative default or decline in asset value, this could be a USD 100 trillion challenge on the base of a Quadrillion. What are the likely outcomes? We are keen to receive your answers and solutions. Please note that the numbers quoted are a rough guide.
We welcome your thoughts, observations and views. To reflect further on this, please respond within Facebook's ATCA Open discussion board.
By Tom Foremski - October 16, 2008
More must read financial analysis from DK Matai, Chairman of the ACTA Open.
The Invisible One Quadrillion Dollar Equation -- Asymmetric Leverage and Systemic RiskAccording to various distinguished sources including the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland -- the central bankers' bank -- the amount of outstanding derivatives worldwide as of December 2007 crossed USD 1.144 Quadrillion, ie, USD 1,144 Trillion. The main categories of the USD 1.144 Quadrillion derivatives market were the following:
1. Listed credit derivatives stood at USD 548 trillion;
2. The Over-The-Counter (OTC) derivatives stood in notional or face value at USD 596 trillion and included:
a. Interest Rate Derivatives at about USD 393+ trillion;
b. Credit Default Swaps at about USD 58+ trillion;
c. Foreign Exchange Derivatives at about USD 56+ trillion;
d. Commodity Derivatives at about USD 9 trillion;
e. Equity Linked Derivatives at about USD 8.5 trillion; and
f. Unallocated Derivatives at about USD 71+ trillion.
Quadrillion? That is a number only super computing engineers and astronomers used to use, not economists and bankers! For example, the North star is "just" a couple of quadrillion miles away, ie, a few thousand trillion miles. The new "Roadrunner" supercomputer built by IBM for the US Department of Energy's Los Alamos National Laboratory has achieved a peak performance of 1.026 Peta Flop per second -- becoming the first supercomputer ever to reach this milestone. One Quadrillion Floating Point Operations (Flops) per second is 1 Peta Flop/s, ie, 1,000 Trillion Flops per second. It is estimated that all the data found on all the websites and stored on computers across the world totals more than One Exa byte of memory, ie, 1,000 Quadrillion bytes of data.
Whilst outstanding derivatives are notional amounts until they are crystallised, actual exposure is measured by the net credit equivalent. This is normally a lower figure unless many variables plot a locus in the wrong direction simultaneously. This could be because of catastrophic unpredictable events, ie, "Black Swans", such as cascades of bankruptcies and nationalisations, when the net exposure can balloon and become considerably larger or indeed because some extremely dislocating geo-political or geo-physical events take place simultaneously. Also, the notional value becomes real value when either counterparty to the OTC derivative goes bankrupt. This means that no large OTC derivative house can be allowed to go broke without falling into the arms of another. Whatever funds within reason are required to rescue failing international investment banks, deposit banks and financial entities ought to be provided on a case by case basis. This is the asymmetric nature of derivatives and here lies the potential for systemic risk to the global economic system and financial markets if nothing is done.
Let us think about the invisible USD 1.144 quadrillion equation with black swan variables -- ie, 1,144 trillion dollars in terms of outstanding derivatives, global Gross Domestic Product (GDP), real estate, world stock and bond markets coupled with unknown unknowns or "Black Swans". What would be the relative positioning of USD 1.144 quadrillion for outstanding derivatives, ie, what is their scale:
1. The entire GDP of the US is about USD 14 trillion.
2. The entire US money supply is also about USD 15 trillion.
3. The GDP of the entire world is USD 50 trillion. USD 1,144 trillion is 22 times the GDP of the whole world.
4. The real estate of the entire world is valued at about USD 75 trillion.
5. The world stock and bond markets are valued at about USD 100 trillion.
6. The big banks alone own about USD 140 trillion in derivatives.
7. Bear Stearns had USD 13+ trillion in derivatives and went bankrupt in March. Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Lehman Brothers and AIG have all 'collapsed' because of complex securities and derivatives exposures in September.
8. The population of the whole planet is about 6 billion people. So the derivatives market alone represents about USD 190,000 per person on the planet.
The Impact of Derivatives
1. Derivatives are securities whose value depends on the underlying value of other basic securities and associated risks. Derivatives have exploded in use over the past two decades. We cannot even properly define many classes of derivatives because they are highly complex instruments and come in many shapes, sizes, colours and flavours and display different characteristics under different market conditions.
2. Derivatives are unregulated, not traded on any public exchange, without universal standards, dealt with by private agreement, not transparent, have no open bid/ask market, are unguaranteed, have no central clearing house, and are just not really tangible.
3. Derivatives include such well known instruments as futures and options which are actively traded on numerous exchanges as well as numerous over-the-counter instruments such as interest rate swaps, forward contracts in foreign exchange and interest rates, and various commodity and equity instruments.
4. Everyone from the large financial institutions, governments, corporations, mutual and pension funds, to hedge funds, and large and small speculators, uses derivatives. However, they have never existed in history with the overarching, exorbitant scale that they now do.
5. Derivatives are unravelling at a fast rate with the start of the "Great Unwind" of the global credit markets which began in July 2007 and particularly after the collapse of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in September this year.
6. When derivatives unravel significantly the entire world economy would be at peril, given the relatively smaller scale of the world economy by comparison.
7. The derivatives market collapse could make the housing and stock market collapses look incidental.
Three Historical Examples
1. The so-called rogue trader Nick Leeson who made a huge derivatives bet on the direction of the Japanese Nikkei index brought on the collapse of Barings Bank in 1995.
2. The collapse of Long Term Capital Management (LTCM), a hedge fund that had a former derivatives and bond dealer from Salomon Brothers and two Nobel Prize winners in Economics as principals, collapsed because of huge leveraged bets in currencies and bonds in 1998.
3. Finally, a lot of the problems of Enron in 2000 were brought on by leveraged derivatives and using derivatives to hide problems on the balance sheet.
The Pitfall
The single conceptual pitfall at the basis of the disorderly growth of the global derivatives market is the postulate of hedging and netting, which lies at the basis of each model and of the whole regulatory environment hyper structure. Perfect hedges and perfect netting require functioning markets. When one or more markets become dysfunctional, the whole deck of cards could collapse swiftly. To hope, as US Treasury Secretary Mr Henry Paulson does, that an accounting ruse such as transferring liabilities, however priced, from a private to a public agent will restore the functionality of markets implies a drastic jump in logic. Markets function only when:
1. There is a price level at which demand meets supply; and more importantly when
2. Both sides believe in each other's capacity to deliver.
Satisfying criterion 1. without satisfying criterion 2. which is essentially about trust, gets one nowhere in the long term, although in the short term, the markets may demonstrate momentary relief and euphoria.
Conclusion
In the context of the USD 700 billion rescue plan -- still being finalised in Washington, DC -- the following is worth considering step by step. Decision makers are rightly concerned about alleviating immediate pressure points in the global financial system, such as, the mortgage crisis, decline in consumer spending and the looming loss of confidence in financial institutions. However, whilst these problems are grave, they are acting as a catalyst to another more massive challenge which may have to be tackled across many nation states simultaneously. As money flows slow down sharply, confidence levels would decline across the globe, and trust would be broken asymmetrically, ie, the time taken to repair it would be much longer. Unless there is government action in concert, this could ignite a chain-reaction which would swiftly purge trillions and trillions of dollars in over-leveraged risky bets. Within the context of over-leverage, the biggest problem of all is to do with "Derivatives", of which CDSs are a minor subset. Warren Buffett has said the derivatives neutron bomb has the potential to destroy the entire world economy, and is a "disaster waiting to happen." He has also referred to derivatives as Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). Counting one dollar per second, it would take 32 million years to count to one Quadrillion. The numbers we are dealing with are absolutely astronomical and from the realms of super computing we have stepped into global economics. There is a sense of no sustainability and lack of longevity in the "Invisible One Quadrillion Dollar Equation" of the derivatives market especially with attendant Black Swan variables causing multiple implosions amongst financial institutions and counterparties! The only way out, albeit painful, is via discretionary case-by-case government intervention on an unprecedented scale. Securing the savings and assets of ordinary citizens ought to be the number one concern in directing such policy.
[ENDS]
To reflect further on this, please respond within Facebook's ATCA Open discussion board.
We welcome your thoughts, observations and views. Thank you.
Best wishes
DK Matai
Chairman, ATCA Open
By Tom Foremski - October 16, 2008
I'm fortunate to be a member of the ACTA Open, which provides great analysis of today's complex financial markets. Here is an excellent analysis by DK Matai, chairman of the ATCA Open. (I'm reprinting it because it is a member only organization - see description at end - but the information should be more widely distributed, imho.)
Why are Markets still Falling? The Tsunami caused by Derivatives and Deleveraging
The invisible elephant in the room causing continuous falls in global financial markets is the link to the privately traded Credit Default Swaps (CDS) and the financial uncertainty they have created whilst synchronised deleveraging takes place across the world. Many CDS contracts have been triggered at their exorbitant notional or face value by a number of bankruptcies and nationalisations and as a result many counterparties are unable to meet their payment obligations which are becoming due week-in week-out in their hundreds of billions of dollars. Much of what is driving the panic in the financial markets is that so little is known about who owes what to whom because of the lack of transparency and no central clearing house for privately traded unregulated derivatives.
Credit default swaps are unregulated financial derivatives which act as debt insurance on risky assets like mortgages, corporate and government bonds. But unlike a normal insurance policy, financial institutions that sell credit default swaps are not required to have enough funds in reserve should those risky loans turn bad. Since the US Congress in 2000 declined to regulate these contracts as it does insurance, the companies that guarantee the assets are not required by law to keep enough capital on hand to pay them off in the event of a default. All that may be about to change. However, evidence suggests more credit default swaps are traded in London than in the United States according to the US Federal Reserve, so US action alone cannot address perceived problems.
As corporations, home owners and credit card holders go into default -- stop making payments -- many financial institutions are being hit twice on their balance sheet -- once by the bad loan and then by the associated CDS default or obligation. This USD 55 trillion problem even at a quarter default, ie, USD 13.75 trillion, is an enormous black hole and equates to nearly 40% of the global equity markets present value at USD 36 trillion. CDS trading has expanded 100-fold since 2001 as financial institutions including insurance companies and hedge funds as well as investors have used the contracts to protect against bond losses and speculate on companies' ability to repay debt. Whilst the credit market was liquid and risk-of-default was relatively low, CDS contracts were cheap to procure: a basis point, or 0.01 percentage point, on a credit-default swap contract protecting USD 10 million of debt from default for five years is equivalent to USD 1,000 a year. Now that the risk is rising, the spreads have widened thereby increasing the value of the original contracts exponentially.
Unlike most financial markets, credit default swaps are unregulated and at USD 54.6 trillion, they are one of the largest unregulated markets in the world. Lawmakers and regulators have called for more oversight of this unregulated market after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, which was among the top 10 counterparties of the contracts. The US government took over New York-based AIG with a USD 85 billion loan to cover obligations at a unit that sold protection on securities through the CDS market. AIG's downfall was triggered when its credit rating was downgraded and it could not post the collateral for which it was obligated under the CDS contracts it had issued. The downfall in the share price of other investment houses and financial institutions including banks, insurance and reinsurance companies is also linked to exposure to toxic assets and the CDS market. There is a clarion call amongst lawmakers to make the terms of credit default swaps transparent and subject to government supervision.
Lawmakers are also considering the introduction of new regulations to curb CDS abuse as engines of speculation, but many financial experts are also encouraging the creation of public exchanges for these shadow markets. An exchange would establish an arms length price. As that price was transparent and moved, the market would see that a credit was deteriorating. A centralised clearing market would help shine a clear light on these transactions and since every trade would be backed up by the members of the clearing house, chances of default would greatly be reduced. There are several organisations that are setting up private exchanges where buyers and sellers can trade credit default swaps. One such initiative is that of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. They hope to be up and running by the end of 2008.
Creation of a clearinghouse for credit default swaps will reduce the risk posed by the financial derivatives, three US regulatory agencies have said and one of them urged broader reform of Over-The-Counter (OTC) derivatives markets, which is in excess of USD 596 trillion according to the Bank for International Settlements in Basel. Coupled with listed credit derivatives at USD 548 trillion, the 1.144 Quadrillion derivatives market is the invisible equation which helps to create asymmetric leverage and systemic risk. As default on CDS contracts rises, there is a fear that other derivatives settlement could also be affected in the case of those issuers which offer several types of derivatives. Looking forwards, armed with USD 50 trillion by way of global GDP, and assets of the whole world valued at about USD 190 trillion, it is difficult to imagine how world governments will be able to stem the Tsunami caused by collapsing leverage and associated derivatives default even if it is to the tune of 10% of the invisible Quadrillion dollar equation, ie, USD 114 trillion. That number is more than double the number of the global GDP. Recapitalising banks to the tune of USD 4+ trillion worldwide recently still leaves the question of raising those funds via government bonds. The trouble lies in all governments seeking to raise new capital via the bond markets simultaneously. One look at the long dated government bond market suggests that the appetite to buy more government debt is diminishing as yields rise and CDS spreads on the possibility of government debt default tick up. In response to the coming derivatives and deleveraging Tsunami, which has already begun, the world GDP may have to shrink drastically -- some estimates suggest between 30% and 50% -- over the coming years of The Great Unwind. This is the severe recession the markets fear as they go into free fall.
G20 Summit must focus on Derivatives, Off-Balance-Sheet Vehicles
8 Bubbles Quadrillion Play Grows 22% to $206k per person-on-planet
London, UK - 19th March 2009, 10:30 GMT
Dear ATCA Open & Philanthropia Friends
[Please note that the views presented by individual contributors are not necessarily representative of the views of ATCA, which is neutral. ATCA conducts collective Socratic dialogue on global opportunities and threats.]
As the April G20 summit in London approaches, it is worth noting that the trans-national play of derivatives has grown from USD 1.144 Quadrillion to USD 1.405 Quadrillion, ie, +22% worldwide. This is a staggering increase and most of it is seen in the Over-The-Counter (OTC) category as opposed to exchange traded derivatives. As a result, the global size of the derivatives bubble which was calculated last year at USD 190k per person-on-planet, has risen to USD 206k per person-on-planet. The ever rising commitment of governments for the repeated bailouts of financial institutions is partially linked to various flavours of derivatives exposure settlements and “black hole” losses emanating from off-balance-sheet vehicles.
The traditional argument has been to discount derivatives altogether: “On one side of the equation there is a loss, on the other side there is a gain. Nothing disappears. It is just one big shuffle of wealth and assets.” However, if this is the case, why has the US tax-payer had to bail out AIG repeatedly in excess of a hundred and fifty billion dollars so that AIG could settle the Credit Default Swap (CDS) and other derivatives claims of the largest trans-national financial institutions in the world?
In the ATCA briefing, "The Invisible One Quadrillion Dollar Equation" published in September 2008 we discussed the main categories of the quadrillion dollar derivatives market as quoted by the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland. Since then the quantum has grown significantly in certain crucial categories and the latest revised numbers follow:
1. Listed credit derivatives stood at USD 542 trillion, about the same as before; however
2. Over-The-Counter (OTC) derivatives stood in notional or face value at USD 863 trillion (UP +44%) and include:
a. Interest Rate Derivatives at about USD 458+ trillion (UP +16%);
b. Credit Default Swaps at about USD 57+ trillion (DOWN -1%);
c. Foreign Exchange Derivatives at about USD 62+ trillion (UP +10%);
d. Commodity Derivatives at about USD 13+ trillion (UP +44%);
e. Equity Linked Derivatives at about USD 10+ trillion (UP +17%); and
f. Unallocated Derivatives at about USD 81+ trillion (UP +14%).The myth of the single bubble behind The Great Unwind -- manifest as the global credit crunch -- has essentially been dumped in the last few months and subprime mortgage default, a USD 1.5 trillion challenge within the USD 5 trillion mortgage based assets envelope, is seen as a component of a much larger overwhelming global crisis with unprecedented scale, speed, severity and synchronicity. The global crisis has wiped a staggering USD 50 trillion off the value of financial assets — currency, equity and bond markets worldwide — last year, according to the Asian Development Bank.
The truth that there are as many as "Eight Bubbles" [ATCA] at play and in the process of bursting together is understood to a greater extent now than in the past. We have gone from being able to “rescue the world” with less than USD 1 trillion in October 2008 to USD 11.6 trillion commitments in the US alone along with a further announcement of USD 1.2 trillion of quantitative easing by the US Fed in March 2009. There is a realisation worldwide including the G7 + BRIC + MISSAT that this is a USD 20 trillion problem and growing. As time goes by, the full extent of the collateral damage from the Quadrillion Play and 8 Bubbles burst is being revealed.
The bursting process is taking the form of deleverage on an unprecedented scale. Even 1929 pales in comparison because the industrial production collapse witnessed over five successive years in the 1930s in the US is now taking place in five to six months, most notably in Japan. At a follow on recent ATCA roundtable we posed the following questions for Socratic dialogue:
I. If the Dow Jones Industrial Average has fallen from above 14,000 to below 7,500 as a result of some of the 8 bubbles collapsing, ie a 6,500 points drop or 46% decline, where will the equities market reach by 2010 as other larger bubbles burst?
II. If the world government bond market is around USD 35 trillion, how can governments rescue the eight bubbles bursting step by step with an ever larger quantum and momentum?
III. How can Quantitative Easing (QE) defy the laws of financial gravity without devaluing paper currencies significantly?
IV. What ought to be the focus at the G20 Summit in April to bring about stability in regard to the rising derivatives exposures and use of off-balance-sheet vehicles?
We discussed “Eight Bubbles” in play worldwide in November 2008 and their approximate scale, based on latest information in 2009, is as follows:
1. Subprime Mortgage linked Loans & Assets (USD 1.5 trillion) within Mortgage backed Assets (USD 5 trillion);
2. China, India, Eastern Europe and other Emerging Market Loans (USD 5 trillion);
3. Commodities (Commodity Derivatives at about USD 13 trillion);
4. Corporate bonds (USD 18 trillion);
5. Commercial (USD 22 trillion) and Residential property (USD 45 trillion);
6. Credit Cards Outstanding Debt (USD 4.5 trillion);
7. Currencies (Foreign Exchange Derivatives at about USD 62 trillion); and
8. Credit Default Swaps (USD 57 trillion) as a subset of all Derivatives (USD 1,405 Trillion).The relative scale of the world's financial engine is as follows:
1. The entire GDP of the US is about USD 14 trillion and falling.
2. The entire US money supply is also about USD 14 trillion with rising Quantitative Easing in trillions.
3. The GDP of the entire world is USD 45 trillion and falling. USD 1,405 trillion is 31 times world GDP.
4. The real estate of the entire world is valued at about USD 65 trillion.
5. The world stock and bond markets are valued at about USD 70 trillion.
6. The trans-national universal model financial institutions own about USD 150 trillion in derivatives.
7. The population of the whole planet is 6.8 billion people. So the derivatives market represents about USD 206,000 per person on the planet.Assuming a 10% conservative default or decline in asset value, this could be a USD 100 trillion challenge on the base of a Quadrillion. USD 50 trillion of asset decline is already manifest. What are the likely outcomes? "Four Scenarios” have already been suggested by ATCA. We are keen to receive your answers and solutions. Please note that the numbers quoted are a rough guide.
[ENDS]
ATCA Open maintains a presence for Socratic Dialogue and feedback on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and Intent.
We welcome your thoughts, observations and views. Thank you.
Best wishes
DK Matai, Chairman, Asymmetric Threats Contingency Alliance (ATCA) & The Philanthropia